12/5/2023 0 Comments Ia writer vs bear reddit![]() ![]() I know people love Scrivener but I must admit I don't get it. I suppose what I am wondering is if you have full WYSIWYG, including citations, is there a compelling reason to lose that and complicate the process? You can also efficiently share a draft and then make changes directly in the document when you get feedback. Word/Writer do all these, including live rendering of Zotero references (and colour text if you need it as aid while drafting). These cover the vast majority of articles I read in my discipline. By 'plain' I mean single column, a boring fontset with just regular/bold/italics, no footnotes, a few subheadings, the odd table perhaps, no maths - you get the idea. I still don't see why anyone would choose to use anything other than a word processor with Zotero's plugin for 'plain' academic writing if they already have a word processor installed. There are some very interesting examples of different workflows here, and I will explore some of them, but I agree. And using plugins you can have a single key binding to fuzzy find a citation from zotero so you don't even have to remember the citekey and it's pretty much frictionless. \cite can basically be done in markdown too using the ^ syntax. LaTeX is really a typesetting language and you shouldn't really be worried about typesetting until you've got all of your content written. I still would argue that writing your first drafts, especially for shorter papers, should be done in some type of markup language like markdown. Obsidians absurdly powerful and growing plugin ecosystem allows me to find tune the language of my personal notes to an almost lisp-like degree. But what Obsidian (and markdown) offer me is a clean platform for rich customization. For writing up papers I typically still use neovim and write LaTeX. LaTeX is unfortunately just more mature at this point in time (and I would argue it's far too mature to the point of being extraordinarily rotten). In my case, I would need a way back from LaTeX to Markdown, since my colleagues also want to make changes in the document which also makes it complicated. So I got colleagues working on the same paper. Normally, I don't write a paper all by myself. If you just need to write some lab report without much plotting, without fancy graphics, and without strict formatting rules you may get away with it.Īnd last but not least is the collaboration aspect. However, if you got really simple PDFs this may be different. I would need to model this in Markdown and Pandoc. Furthermore, I use a lot of Latex features like plotting with tikz, fancy tables from csvs, minipages, etc. If I would want to use Markdown + Pandoc I would need to configure the transition from Markdown -> Pandoc -> Latex which is basically a pain in the ass for Journal templates. ![]() This means I get some Journal templates that I am required to use. Personally (and most people I know who are using LaTeX), I do use LaTeX for scientific papers. If your desired PDF output is close to plain markdown (Headings, light formatting, maybe some figures and references) this could be somewhat obtainable. The answer comes down to personal requirements. So the question is whether this is possible and if so how feasible it is. This adds one layer of complexity to your whole process to be able to exclusively use Markdown. If you try to generate your PDF from Obsidan (Markdown) your workflow is as follows. Second, it depends on your requirements for your PDF script. I never used pandoc really intensively so I may be wrong. Unless people use the focus/typewriter mode in certain markdown editors or, like me, they prefer a dark theme, I really don't see the difference.Īnyone using Obsidian/markdown for academic writing, particularly in social sciences/humanities, what are your experiences? Genuine question. Surely, Word and LibreOffice Writer can be made distraction-free too - toolbars can be hidden, spelling/grammar checking can be switched off etc. I also fail to see how Obsidian/markdown is distraction-free, as people often say, compared to the usual word-processors. Then, I move the text to Word/Writer for polishing up, so it's not like I broke free from heavy word-processors. Markdown offers many advantages (longevity, simplicity and openness), but so far I have been using it for a first pass in my writing. The last thing you need hours before a deadline is discovering you have to handle hundreds of citations manually. Relying on Pandoc adds a layer of complexity and incompatibility with Zotero's addons for Word/Writer, and the markdown file doesn't itself contain the rendered citations. I am using Obsidian for academic note-taking and cross-linking, and I am considering also doing my writing in it, but I am not quite sure if this is a good idea or a rabbit hole. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |